by Guest » Mon Jun 16, 2008 05:29 pm
I have to find out how do statue of limitations work. I was in an accident in June of 2006; it was 100% the other persons fault. I did exactly as the adjuster told me, and did exactly what my doctors told me. In August of 2006 I rear ended a lady, (so lightly it didn't even scratch or dent her car) I told my doctor so that she would know. Now the adjuster is telling me (on the day when, I believe the statue of limitations is up) that they don't have to pay most of my medical bills because I told my doctor that I had a second accident. So my question if the second accident aggravated my injuries is this true?
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 09:16 pm Post Subject:
Maybe...but ''causing'' an injury is 'worth' more than aggravating a pre-exsisting injury....did you file a claim for the august accident as well? Did you see the doc again for that? What were your medical bills etc...from June to Aug? They definately would owe for that.
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 07:27 pm Post Subject: Limitation
If a person files a claim, and become dissatisfied with the claim amount on a cash value policy on a commercial building, what is the limitation for filing a law suit?
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 07:29 pm Post Subject: Limitation
If a person files a claim, and become dissatisfied with the claim amount on a cash value policy on a commercial building, what is the limitation for filing a law suit?
Add your comment