by Boyd » Sat May 24, 2008 06:58 am
I was one of several cars hit from behind by a school bus. The insurance company for the bus has determined that my car is worth less than the repair value, and thus want's to write me a check and be done with it. I guess that works out well for them, so naturally they would go this way since they have a financial incentive. Therein lies my problem - the conflict of interest here.
I believe the car is worth more than the repair estimate. They claim the car is work $6500 (using some other resource and then applying "discounts") and that the repair is $7000. I believe the car is worth $12,000 based on Kelly Blue Book. By writing me a check for $6500, they avoid paying a rental car for 3 weeks AND any posibility that the repair fee goes up. It all comes down to the issue of them being in a position to assess the value. I call bullshit.
I want to dispute (in court if necessary) their claim the car is worth $6500. I then want them to fix the car.
What recourse do I have?
I believe the car is worth more than the repair estimate. They claim the car is work $6500 (using some other resource and then applying "discounts") and that the repair is $7000. I believe the car is worth $12,000 based on Kelly Blue Book. By writing me a check for $6500, they avoid paying a rental car for 3 weeks AND any posibility that the repair fee goes up. It all comes down to the issue of them being in a position to assess the value. I call bullshit.
I want to dispute (in court if necessary) their claim the car is worth $6500. I then want them to fix the car.
What recourse do I have?
Posted: Fri May 23, 2008 08:00 pm Post Subject:
First, they owe (by law) either the cost to repair the vehicle or it's value. No more, no less.
Why such the discrepancy in the value of the vehicle? You really need to see a copy of their report and see if it's accurate! It's possible that they are not including all the options or even have the right model.
If your looking at KBB (which I'm told you should not), are you looking at the retail value? If so, this is not the correct amount. Read what KBB has to define retail value. That does not match your car.
Posted: Fri May 23, 2008 08:22 pm Post Subject:
the KBB value is the retail value (what it would cost me to replace the vehicle). The resale value is about $10,500 ($1500 less), still much higher than their assessed value.
Posted: Fri May 23, 2008 08:45 pm Post Subject:
Again, read directly from KBB what retail value means. Better yet, I'll quote it:"This value assumes the vehicle has received the cosmetic and/or mechanical reconditioning needed to qualify it as "Excellent". This is not a transaction value; it is representative of a dealer's asking price and the starting point for negotiation."
The used to have a longer definition that pointed out that dealer's are the ones using retail values and that these vehicles usually have a warranty along with them.
So as you can see, the retail value is the sticker price that no one actually pays. The about the vehicle really sells for is much less. Also, did your vehicle have any type of warranty on it? I'm doubting it did. So it's not a fair comparison.
Posted: Sat May 24, 2008 01:29 pm Post Subject:
I know of no carrier that uses Kelly...check it on NADA or even Edmunds...if you'd like post yr/make/model/mileage/and ALL options...also is there by chance any PRIOR (to the accident) UNREPAIRED damage? if so then a percentage of this will come off of the vehicles ACV (actual cash value)...I like tcope am perplexed at the differences...generally do not see such a wide gap...somethings missing...again if you'd like I'd be happy to check the value based on the data base I have....
Posted: Sat May 24, 2008 01:52 pm Post Subject:
It is a 2001 Volvo T5 with 130k miles. It has all options except CD changer and upgraded Audio. Has sunroof, thirdseat, roofracks. 1 owner and extremely well maintained.
THanks for any help you can provide. I really liked the car and driving it. To replace it would cost me far more than the $6500 they are offering - I don't understand where that figure comes from.
Posted: Sat May 24, 2008 01:59 pm Post Subject:
Lancer I posted on your other thread too....but if it's a v70-5cly, 4door turbo T5 wagon, then I get 9025.00 no addition for any of the options you have listed other than power sunroof...check the other thread and update the options please.
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 12:00 am Post Subject:
Also keep in mind that settlements on auto insurance physical damage is not based on the replacement cost of the car- it's based on the Actual Cash Value, or ACV at the time of the loss. Think depreciation and a whole lot more. The way I used to explain it to my insureds was based on what a dealer would pay you for the car (that's not exactly right, but it's close, and good enough for discussion purposes).
A lot of people are under the impression that the at-fault party's insurance company should pay to REPLACE my car, as that is what I would have to do if it were totalled. Please keep in mind that market conditions will also affect the value of the car. As an example, big old gas-sucking SUVs are NOT being valued at book right now. Dealers in my area are giving (easily) less than 85% of NADA book right now due to the cost of gasoline. Conversely, vehicles with great gas mileage are at a premium. I am not sure whether this will affect insurance settlements, but I have a feeling it might.
I have a feeling that LORI will chime in here at some point with additional info, and she really knows what's going on with this stuff.
Again- they aren't going to pay you the retail replacement cost. That's not how it works, unfortunately. As well, Lori- can you explain "diminished value" to our forum members? That anticipates that you are aware, and I hope that I haven't put you on the spot here.
InsTeacher 8)
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 10:55 am Post Subject:
As well, Lori- can you explain "diminished value" to our forum members
well I could, but more than likely another fifty page thread would occur... :wink: :roll: It wouldn't apply in this instance, the vehicle is totaled right? Diminished value would/could only be considered if repaired..Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 02:41 pm Post Subject:
Yes... keep in mind that betterment/depreciation (ACV) and diminishment of value are completely different things.
Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 11:43 am Post Subject:
keep in mind that betterment/depreciation (ACV) and diminishment of value are completely different things.
yeah, buddy and all don't apply if repaired or totaledAdd your comment