by anlambe5 » Fri Jul 24, 2009 02:08 am
Anna M Lambert
5739965147
are there rule on dispositions and representation
discrimination due to disability, dennied compensaytion from accident due being disabled
The attorney is needed for my sister Rebecca Clark. I believe her current attoryney is misrepresenting her in an accident case against Christly Little of Poplar Bluff,MO.(whose father is an Attorney in Poplar Bluff, MO.). Durring a disposition today 7/23/2009 at Bascom Law firm office the defendant Ms Christy Little brought in a cell phone camera and took pictures of my sister, and wrote down infromation of Ms. Clarks address, and the location and phone numbers of the other parties involved in the accident that occured on Jan 21, 2007.Where as my sister Rebecca Clark was not allowed to sit in on Ms. Christy Little's disposition. Also my sisters attorney was the only person who had Ms. Clarks autherisation for medical records release of specific date and not date going back 5 years prior to the accident as well as Ms. Clarks disability record from the federal department of social securiy and disability department. By this action Ms. Clark's HPPTA rights were clearly violated and her medical privacy was violated. Ms. Clark's attorney had given all of Ms.Clarks medical records to the defendants attorney prior to this disposition without autherisation to do so from Ms. Clark . Also the defendant Ms. Little has a current history of DWI and admitted to this durring the dispsition. Ms. Little also admits that prior to and after the accident she had those issues with DWI incidents.Another situation is my sister is being dicriminated due to the fact she is a disabled person, and she was not treated fairly and she is not being represented appropiately. The defendant's attoney is trying to state that no damage was done , even though Ms. Clark car was tottled after being pushed acrossed an intersection and pined against a pole. We had taken photos of both vechicles and damage done to those vechicles as a result of said accident.But the defendants's attorney refuses to acknowledge them and Ms. Clark's attorney refuses to admit them as evidence or use for reference in questing about said incident. Also the defendant Ms. Christly Little has avoided summons and dispositions until recently which was 2 years after the accident, and I believe that there is a time limit to file a law suit and that both attorneys have delayed so to avoid settlement. This may be classified as a cival suit I believe. Also both attorneys informed that due to the fact that Ms. Clark is disable that she did not substain any injuries that it just aggrivated previous condition and they both attorneys state they doubt a case exist due to the fact that Ms. Clark was disabled prior to the accident, and that injuries inflicted from accident are not relevent and she is not entitled to compensation for said injuries or replacement of her vechicle that was tottled.
5739965147
are there rule on dispositions and representation
discrimination due to disability, dennied compensaytion from accident due being disabled
The attorney is needed for my sister Rebecca Clark. I believe her current attoryney is misrepresenting her in an accident case against Christly Little of Poplar Bluff,MO.(whose father is an Attorney in Poplar Bluff, MO.). Durring a disposition today 7/23/2009 at Bascom Law firm office the defendant Ms Christy Little brought in a cell phone camera and took pictures of my sister, and wrote down infromation of Ms. Clarks address, and the location and phone numbers of the other parties involved in the accident that occured on Jan 21, 2007.Where as my sister Rebecca Clark was not allowed to sit in on Ms. Christy Little's disposition. Also my sisters attorney was the only person who had Ms. Clarks autherisation for medical records release of specific date and not date going back 5 years prior to the accident as well as Ms. Clarks disability record from the federal department of social securiy and disability department. By this action Ms. Clark's HPPTA rights were clearly violated and her medical privacy was violated. Ms. Clark's attorney had given all of Ms.Clarks medical records to the defendants attorney prior to this disposition without autherisation to do so from Ms. Clark . Also the defendant Ms. Little has a current history of DWI and admitted to this durring the dispsition. Ms. Little also admits that prior to and after the accident she had those issues with DWI incidents.Another situation is my sister is being dicriminated due to the fact she is a disabled person, and she was not treated fairly and she is not being represented appropiately. The defendant's attoney is trying to state that no damage was done , even though Ms. Clark car was tottled after being pushed acrossed an intersection and pined against a pole. We had taken photos of both vechicles and damage done to those vechicles as a result of said accident.But the defendants's attorney refuses to acknowledge them and Ms. Clark's attorney refuses to admit them as evidence or use for reference in questing about said incident. Also the defendant Ms. Christly Little has avoided summons and dispositions until recently which was 2 years after the accident, and I believe that there is a time limit to file a law suit and that both attorneys have delayed so to avoid settlement. This may be classified as a cival suit I believe. Also both attorneys informed that due to the fact that Ms. Clark is disable that she did not substain any injuries that it just aggrivated previous condition and they both attorneys state they doubt a case exist due to the fact that Ms. Clark was disabled prior to the accident, and that injuries inflicted from accident are not relevent and she is not entitled to compensation for said injuries or replacement of her vechicle that was tottled.
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 02:23 am Post Subject: up dated
the defendant hit my sister's car in the side and the damage done to her car was side impac damage, passenger wheel was pushed inside of the passenger side, she recieved bruises , abrasions from seat belt, she also recieved a head concussion, she was bleding for over two weeks after the accident, along with suffering from sever headaches, and still suffers from headaches.
The other party damage the front end and deployed air bags, but did not recieved treatment at the scene of the accident where as my sister rode the amblance to the hospital from the scene of the accident. Ms. Little refused treatment and was not tested for alcohol, but my sister was tested and had nothing in her system. Considering that MJs. Little has a history of DWI prior to the accident and after the accident should that not be admissable? Considering they the attornies use my sisters disability against her? Also my sister was at a protected intersection and she had stoped and waited for the light to change to a green arrow, but due to another car going through the intersection she waited , approached the intersection looked and no one appeared to be any where and she proceeded to turn while the light wwas still green arrow. The defendant Ms. Little acording to my sister smelt of alcohol and she mentioned it to the officer but they did nothing, and we are unsure if it was documented since Ms. Little's father is a promodient Lawer in the community this occured in.
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 07:26 am Post Subject:
But the defendants's attorney refuses to acknowledge them and Ms. Clark's attorney refuses to admit them as evidence or use for reference in questing about said incident.
Haven't you received any explanation from Ms Clarke's attorney regarding his defiance?
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 09:45 am Post Subject:
Was your sister driving the vehicle herself? Weren't there any witnesses at the scene of the accident who can be testified before the judge?
Well, it seems that Ms little is little too powerful in the locality.
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 12:39 pm Post Subject:
First off OP you've posted A LOT of private information for the world to see...secondly if your sister is represented by an attorney she is paying that attorney for his advise.
If the other carrier has not paid to fix/total her vehicle then there must be a liability dispute...
They most certainly can offset an injury with a prior disability.
What is your sisters disability? When and how was she disabled? How long has she been disabled?
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 01:30 pm Post Subject:
The OP started another thread with information, I'm deleting that thread and placing her answer here....anlambe5, stick to this thread, when discussing this accident please...don't start new threads..
answer for if she was driving the answer is yes, as for the answer to her disability she has been disabled as a child for schololosis, and ADHA . As per witnesses no ,no one has any witnesses except for the passengers . But at the intersection it was a protected intersection that has a green turn lane arrow, and my sister has a green arrow and she proceeded into the turn lane to turn and the other party was the one for whom hit her vechicle. After all her damage was the whole front end with main damage done to front passenger panel where as the other vechicle was only front end damage except for damage done to their driver door wher the vechicle swong over and slid into the victims car. And yes after the accident we observed the lights at said intersection. And from observation both green arrows appear on at the same time and we feel that is what the other driver had interpeted as a green light. And the other driver had just left a drive through resturant Sonic , so perhapss the other driver was drinking and eating eating and did not pay attention and assumed the green arrow was a green light.
Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 07:08 am Post Subject:
I think you had a police report filed at the scene, what does it suggest?
Like Lori has mentioned if the carrier of the other driver hasn't paid for the damages there must a liability dispute. Hasn't the insurer sent a proper letter of denial to your sister? And, if so, what does it state?
Add your comment