Do I have 2 follow immoral/potentially dangerous treatment?

by Guest » Sat Jan 22, 2011 03:39 pm
Guest

My health ins. denied benefits for a hysteroscopy preformed during a laporoscopy looking for endometriosis which I was found to have severly. They denied it based on the fact that I had not tried treatment with oral contraceptives for 3 months before the procedure. I refuse to take birth control due to the world health organization deeming it highly carcinogenic and for religious reasons. (Im Catholic) They cant force me to follow an immoral and potentially dangerous course of treatment in order for them to approve a claim can they? They approved the surgery but not that part of it. Leaving me to owe 1200.00

Total Comments: 4

Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 12:05 pm Post Subject:

I do empathize with you...and wish to come back with more information on this.

Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 04:10 pm Post Subject:

This is discriminatory, what they did. Surely they cannot deny one his or her benefits due to that person's beliefs, right? I, too, would like to know the courses of action needed in cases like this.


_____________
credit repair

Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 02:02 pm Post Subject:

looks like you'll have to bite the bullet or file a grievance.

Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 09:28 pm Post Subject:

I think you should just go to a lawyer. He can take this moral issue into something legal, which, in my opinion is easier to assert and fight for from that front.

Add your comment

Enter the characters shown in the image.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.