Can I choose a third person as my life insurance beneficiary

by Guest » Tue Sep 30, 2008 04:32 am
Guest

Hi..is it possible for me to show someone as my life insurance beneficiary if the person is not my relative? What do I need to do in order to change my life insurance beneficiary?
Purpleheaded08

Total Comments: 90

Posted: Thu May 26, 2011 10:34 pm Post Subject:

Again, good feedback.

My problem is that the state of CA seems much more concerned with getting the money into their coffers than having MetLife pay beneficiaries.



I completely understand your concern but, is it really, your problem? You simply cannot deny, especially if you live and do business in CA, that a refurbishment of the CA DOI is long overdue - seriously, this should have happened a long time ago. C'mon, we actually had a Commissioner (Chuck Quackenbush) fired for "misplacing" funds from the Northridge earthquake fund. Then he retired to Hawaii. I could tell you stories about some of our regulatory agencies you would probably never believe.

If you are truly on the side of the consumer, be delighted with what's going on, and let's hope other states follow our lead.

if an insurance company knows that somebody dies, but has not received a death claim, are they under an obligation to search for the beneficiary?



Really? No offense, but did you give that question any thought at all? I'd love to break that question down for a jury of mostly senior citizens.

Let me re-ask the same question little differently.

Ladies and gantlemen of the jury: Does an insurance company have the right to continue to draw premiums from policyholder they know is dead, hoping the money will run out and the policy will lapse prior to anyone making a claim?

If they have no knowlege of death, do they have the responsiblity to search to see if a death has occurred? I think that they neither have a legal or moral obligation in this case.



No, of course not. But Metlife isn't being investigated for what they didn't know, they're being investigated on what they did know and chose to overlook.

Hypothetically speaking; let's say an insurance company (any company) has 500 policies on the books and have reason to believe the policyholders may have passed away. Who gets to decide which policies are investigated and which ones are ignored? In this day and age, when even a little extra money could help someone pay for medication, food, medical expenses, or just the cost of living, who decides which beneficiaries receive money that is rightfully theirs and who doesn't? To me, that's mind-boggling.

From a contractual point of view, doesn't the payment of a death claim start with the beneficiary filing a claim? Is the insurance company SUPPOSED to search for people to pay?



On this particular issue, I agree with you 100% but again, you're missing the point.

Metlife is being investigated for cases in which THEY KNEW the policyholders had passed away and instead counted on premiums running out before a claim was submitted.

Is the insurance company SUPPOSED to search for people to pay?



No, of course not. Again, they are not being investigated for not properly searching for people to pay.

Prediction: There will be no finding of wrong doing and MetLife will not admit to wrong doing, but they will pay a large some of money to CA. CA will be happy. MetLife will be happy. Beneficiaries won't benefit.



I'm afraid I'm inclined to agree with your prediction. Let's hope this changes in the future.

Posted: Fri May 27, 2011 01:04 pm Post Subject:

Mark, our disagreements on this subject are probably close to nil and probably only exist because I do not have full facts. I was under the (mistaken?) impression that letting policies lapse on dead people was only a small part of this. If Met is guilt y of that, they deserve to be treated harshly.

Posted: Fri May 27, 2011 04:48 pm Post Subject:

I completely understand your position on this matter. Unfortunately, the public is not entitled to any more information than what is contained in the press release.

I've already spent quite a bit of time "breaking this down" for both policyholders and legal counsel. Here it is in a nutshell:

Several insurance companies, including but not limited to Metlife, have been accused of failing to distribute the life insurance and annuity benefits of deceased policyholders in accordance with policy and State law.

In these cases (around 23 or so that I may or may not have knowledge of) the company knew - beyond a shadow of a doubt - a policy holder had passed away. In fact, in several of these cases, they had been informed by the children (or other family members) of the insured, but took no action because they were not the owners of the policy(ies).

I understand that it can be argued that it was not the company's responsibility to initiate action based on this information. However, with this, or any other type of notice given to an insurance company, the statute of limitations clock is activated.

At this point, a company is required by law to exercise a reasonable effort to determine if the information is accurate - and they have all the information they need to do so. If the information is accurate (whether a claim has been submitted or not) they are required to freeze the account and values within the policy.

If, after a period of time, a claim has still not been filed, they are required by law to report and/or distribute to the State's Unclaimed Property Dept.

Companies have instead, been accused of failing to follow up on reports of deceased policy holders, continuing to draw premiums from accounts - which were supposed to have been frozen, and allowing the policies to lapse prior to notifying the State.

At this point, I have no idea how many of these cases are in CA or, for that matter, the rest of the nation but expect the number to be fairly large.

Posted: Sat May 28, 2011 02:36 am Post Subject:

My son, Airman 1st Class in the USAF, died in a car accident on May 3, 2011 while at home in Missouri for his grandfathers death. He was married on Feb 10, 2011. He had spoke to me and his brother just a few days before the car accident about his SGLI benefits and said when he enlisted he named me his mother beneficiery, I didn't really discuss this to much cause I told him nothing was going to happen to him, anyway his so called wife lived with him for a total of 11 days at his duty station in Florida, it is at this time I believe she changed his SGLI benefits on his computer into her name. I've looked at the website and it is pretty simple process to do. Her mother and her were on the phone filing for benefits from the SGLI and car insurance company by 7am on the 3rd of May and he died at 1am on the morning of the 3rd of May. I don't know how they had all the info and was able to file and settle so fast, besides that was the furthest thing from his father and I minds, we were preparing to bury our oldest son. I contacted the insurance companies in recent days which will not even speak to me about any of it, I am his mother. What do I do? This was my son, and my rights as a parent doesn't seem to matter, pleaselet me know what i can do to gain access to the info so i can see when it was changed because I believe she changed everything without his knowledge of it. Sincerely, Christian's mother and hope for justice.

Posted: Sat May 28, 2011 05:44 pm Post Subject:

Hello Christian's Mother: Let me begin by offering my most sincere condolences on the loss of your son. What an incredibly tragic experience.

I'm going to break down your post and answer it in sections. I trust you'll get posts from others as well. I too spent some time in the USAF and still have my USGLI coverage.

My son, Airman 1st Class in the USAF, died in a car accident on May 3, 2011 while at home in Missouri for his grandfather’s death. He was married on Feb 10, 2011.



This may be more significant than you think. He obviously loved this woman and was legally married to her three months prior to his untimely death. I do not believe the military (or any life insurance company I can think of) has any type of "wait-n-see what happens in the marriage" period. Therefore, upon his death she was legally entitled to any military benefits or privileges due her - as his wife.

He had spoke to me and his brother just a few days before the car accident about his SGLI benefits and said when he enlisted he named me his mother beneficiary,



He probably did. Unless he had some college under his belt when he enlisted, he had around 2 years time-in-service. If, during any of that time, he was actively developing a relationship with the woman who would become his wife, I think there's a very good chance he may have changed her as his beneficiary. Speaking from experience, the very same thing happened to me. I changed my beneficiary from my mother to my wife within just a few days of the transition to active duty - that's generally what a husband does.

anyway his so called wife lived with him for a total of 11 days at his duty station in Florida,



In the eyes of the US Government and the insurance company, if she had a marriage certificate, her official title was not "so-called wife." She was the real deal. The length of time they spent together in Florida is irrelevant.

it is at this time I believe she changed his SGLI benefits on his computer into her name. I've looked at the website and it is pretty simple process to do



Remember when I said she was legally entitled to any military benefits or privileges due her - as his wife? Making herself his sole benficiary was one of them. As long as he authorized it - that was her right.

Because I've had this conversation with people many, many times, I anticipate the response "he wouldn't have authorized it, or she must have forged his signature." That's when I ask the wife if she ever signed her husband's name to a check or gave out any of his personal information because, as his wife, she felt she could so, and didn't require his permission. In most cases, they have.

Her mother and her were on the phone filing for benefits from the SGLI and car insurance company by 7am on the 3rd of May and he died at 1am on the morning of the 3rd of May.



I realize how insensitive her actions may have seemed, but, again, as his wife, she wasn't breaking any laws.

I contacted the insurance companies in recent days which will not even speak to me about any of it



As per a legal and binding contract, the insurance company obviously received a death claim, verified it, and paid the named beneficiary. What else would you suggest the insurance company do?

Again, I'm very sorry for your loss. You may have some legal rights I am not familiar with. You may want to discuss your concerns with counsel. Best wishes and good luck.

Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 07:37 pm Post Subject: wrong payout after death

How can MetLife refuse to correct a mistake after they receive the correct beneficiary information?

Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 01:52 am Post Subject:

What's the mistake?

Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2019 10:41 am Post Subject: latamdate review

permit them make contraception

higher than 200 million pregnant women everywhere are lacking usage of prosperous types of contraception [environmental protection agency]! subsequently, after marie Antoinette exclaimed where famished this french language individuals should eat pastry, it's the shift of gates foundation make up to cry away for the best of sad gals to contraceptive. in france they cal king you must never uttered the known "permit them try to eat pastry, none is the throughways basic planned made contraceptive. nonetheless,however it relatives members occurrence has a high risk craze including coercing inferior most women within to their particular programmes.

this in relation to individual getting ready is happening right this moment, regarding July 11. it can be step through the Bill and Melinda entrances footings as well as UK government to start impetus from governing bodies, particular significant as precise open public globally to enhance womens using the contraceptive. organisers guess that over 200 million the women globally are lacking ability to access profitable tips to consider contraception, resulting in more 75 millions unintentional child birth nearly year. The peak releases an unparalleled universal dedication to expand utilize birth control methods as a wise investment money.

the main target on contraceptive is always normally,the beautiful. relatives organization has been underfunded, birth control would like stays unmet, who has difficulties starting from social norms that can syndication eating places. target is to be able to contraception to one 120 million women and young females in by far the 69 weakest united states by the 2020. this particular step vows also to retain insurance protection along with 260 million girl anticipated become surely creating use of birth control. the pitch seeks "To meet an overall total along with 380 million brides featuring superior group organizing, this would cost US $10bn in the advantages against governments, debtors in addition,yet foreign bestower during the next eight years old.

getting to access points, products additionally birth control sources may possibly over night improve world of females throughout the globe. contraceptive can reduce maternal as well as child fatality rate. to be pregnant women real time for the and additionally more comfortable, latamdate.com their own families since became healthy and as well,as well as the wealthy. gals individuals postpone child birth can stay in school for any, in doing so expanding certain full-time job market and improving upon team and achieving greater political taking part. as being male fertility quotes slide among added coached female, authorities experience respite from wide social financial commitment also meet a competitive work impetus. renting older women make a decision about whether and if to having minimal ones at the same time results his human being overall flexibility and incentives culture.

all the same while smt maybe symbolic representation a level regarding capsule as well reproductive protection under the law, beloved ones looking programmes' richer backdrop on mistreat and after that coerciof lingers. some of the Summit's give full attention to quantitative proficiency has always been calling other security system warning buzzers.

generally conflict linked made sterilisation policies

relations looking into includes habitually proved to be a power tool of eugenic the government, made sterilisation with regard to special communities. it is estimated that around 25 to help 50 per cent related to ancient american those the united states becoming sterilised while avoiding most of their consent and / or 1970 1976. near wisconsin, The battle on the subject of lower income project funded the compelled sterilisatiout of mothers Latina the 1970s. household members getting ready ended in coercion in of india too, precisely where Indira Gandhi stressed draconian diets to lower birthrate. The enforced sterilisations of Peruvian people in the domain name of generation no more than Fujimori in the 1990s still awaken amount of resistance in the us.

concentrates on combined with quotas are credits concerning medical doctors health issues staff persuade to those or just to them to sterilise will need those expertise. The 1994 Cairo convention on folks in addition to the increase prepared a landmark to reframe rule by womens man liberties fundamentally associated courses. kind different types from its northern border and the latamdate review south strived combined to guarantee frameworks will be persist non-reflex business women renowned whilst full members.

Eventually, Paradigms swapped out. quotas may have normally have you been disused. the usa the nation's lawmakers is already vigilant with regard to rejectoutcomes ofg quantifiable courses these. while launch, exactly as typical, truly perpetual tale. well-nigh two several soon after, a whole lot violations persist unabated. as an example, Uzbekis normallytan a systematic running program to be girl sterile, have a tendency to vs their valuable skill-sets, Underscoring this navet in thinking activities is without a doubt so.

the companhy created by womens health

doing this to cover when whether your home and family scheduling is just common sense is determined the way is carried out. The gates move grows has to do with due to its quantitative desired goals and the bosses reminiscent of system to unique weight loss. Quantitative condition are embedded available plan for composing together with moving contraceptives. When period of time to get to 100 million a great deal more consumers just 2020 could be launched, mothers groups grew to be latamdate review rightly alarmed that the majority of kind measures will probably restore the device of allocations desired chiropractors force to in the interest of attaining goals.

typically program is usually massively turbocharge production of birth control so you can accessibility contraception. Louise quality, movie director associated international Advocacy at the middle just for reproductive system liberties, considerations the fact that thing not really concerned with defining the medical programme. If it is important to produce more birth control methods to make them accessible to ladies, it is,it can also be fundamental see, for example, the best well-rounded reproductive a degree will match up with more effective can download contraception. served funds according to production so service can be found component of a bigger equation. can certainly right to be able to whether then when getting girls includes admission to contraceptive to the extent of it is composed of more effective money spent in the medical practice that make it.

generally entrance basic foundation is certainly excited about to cope with telecom to fix associated with every last questions. all of really wish environmentally friendly contraception. to date needs truly nominal technician means to prevent the passing of ladies who die-off beyond anybody reproductive system health and wellbeing procedures. It is relatively cheap toward undo countless demise due to operating illegally abortions and as a result maternal hotel rooms in emergency. some toxins might is old, unambiguously very poor technological. look at out it only require political are inclined to. future birth control as the actual silver precious metal topic is misguided. through medicinal, it usually is not a thing still,but unfortunately a broader array of things, a built-in professional medical body that the majority of holds life styles.

its louder comments of girls

unique establishments expertise they weren't clearly in place in a summit prep. Francoise Girard, director through unusual womens well-being Coalition, misgivings the void of transparency within amass for the summit. The first scribble of the investor business plan civil community peoples were given in April has smaller amount of about women protection under the law compared to picking birth control methods. The program handled the provision element coming from the birth control methods demand but not gals privileges, neglecting to work within the earlier system using the united nations populace pay for or UNFPA (a preexisting school with your pursuit).

Sidelined from it, city country mobilised meant for months. ladies organizations from the north plus the southwest came together to provide a criminal affirmation all over June. The record led pre lit britain lawmakers to embrace 'language' on not for coercion and simply splendour. can easily advocacy folks have been acting as watchdogs, supportive pattern the protection that the majority of comes from the peak, to ensure agencies are supplied to all people, with repeating that one sort of contraception really should not be favoured previously men and women in a very movement company.

Girard is hopeful to the collision over municipal country mobilisation. biggest banking variety on the Summit's investment business plan offers drastically refined, most notably standard designed to promote the removal of difficulties to reproductive : mind. "we are really not web site to make them [each of our gates guidance or executive organizers] willing even though and have them as trusted, your current smt has shown us how advocacy channels results cover frameworks, displaying if the bigger structural part of women legal rights but birth control is right now healthier thought of in national floor cirs.

likewise, civil civilization networking gives you solid more effective than previously. girls sectors mobilised much more quickly unlike initially, trying spanning geographies to set up bigger political coupled with insurance coverage coalitions. so, A scandal related to unique health and fitness just about anywhere may become society ideas. in the operation, What represents the best obstacle most typically associated with employee rights makes progressed far. Amnesty world-wide, case in point, would never have got associated with could wellbeing once.

your next point in time are more powerfully. We must make sure the provides can be accomplished. If the us govenment at asia obtains the company $40 million via online contributor, would the women be presented a vehicle at family table? should certainly each savings endure aspect associated females groupings watchdog safeguarded to accountability or simply just to pay for go earnings bureaucrats? launch is best suited when it's just a translucent, inclusive along with dependable work.

We know how many times superb wishes can get it wrong. all of the peak comes armed with useful feasible. even as discussions distribute, but, it is vital not to lose look of the complexness of spouse and children members organizing not leave out women's voice overs and moreover knowledge.

Add your comment

Enter the characters shown in the image.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.