by MaxHerr » Fri Aug 15, 2014 11:59 pm
For those who have followed some of the threads on insurable interest, or the absence of the same, and don't believe that insurable interest is a valid, enforceable concept, take a look at this appellate decision that upholds the insurance company's right to void a policy for no insurable interest.
http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca5/13-60726/13-60726-2014-08-07.html?utm_source=Justia+Law&utm_campaign=c945ab5692-summary_newsletters_practice&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_92aabbfa32-c945ab5692-405931782
http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca5/13-60726/13-60726-2014-08-07.html?utm_source=Justia+Law&utm_campaign=c945ab5692-summary_newsletters_practice&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_92aabbfa32-c945ab5692-405931782
Add your comment