primary beneficiary removed by chancellor

by minnie » Sun Feb 21, 2010 01:41 am
Posts: 2
Joined: 21 Feb 2010

my husband showed me as the primary beneficiary on his employer life ins. policy in 1984. we divorced in 1992 and he never changed the beneficiary designation. He later was declared incompetent & in 2003 the guardian/chancellor removed me as the primary beneficiary. the estate was shown as the beneficiary. is this legal with the us supreme court ruling of kennedy v dupont?

Total Comments: 1

Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 12:38 pm Post Subject:

Better ask an attorney...I'd doubt that a court appointed guardian could've done so without court approval. His estate would mean his heirs anyway..wouldn't the money then flow to his children, and wouldn't you want it that way?

Add your comment

Enter the characters shown in the image.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.