Are contractors liable for their subs?

by Frekals » Thu Jan 06, 2011 06:09 am

I hit an unprotected pot hole in a construction zone. I have solid evidence that the construction company was negligent. I filed the complaint with the main construction company and they denied it. I am filing a lawsuit in small claims. Should I just name the main construction company or name the sub as well?

So, the question is will a court hold the main construction company responsible for the work of their subs or court a court deny my case because the it was the subs fault?

Total Comments: 3

Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 04:39 am Post Subject:

You could just keep asking this SAME QUESTION OVER AND OVER. :roll:

Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 05:27 am Post Subject:

Or you could just be RUDE! I have to keep revising it because NO ONE is answering it appropriately. Didn’t your mom ever teach you if you don’t have something nice to say DON’T say anything at all????????

I am seeking help. I actually write you personally and you ignored me so thanks for your help!!!

Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 02:27 pm Post Subject:

I stand corrected... you did write me a PM and I never answered. So I certainly do apologize. It's a little late but I'll take a look at it this weekend.

Add your comment

Enter the characters shown in the image.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.